View Single Post
Old 04-09-2013, 05:42 PM   #8
twobob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°){ʇlnɐɟ ƃǝs}Týr
twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
twobob's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,586
Karma: 6299993
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: uti gratia usura (Yao ying da ying; Mo ying da yieng)
Device: PW-WIFI|K5-3G+WIFI| K4|K3-3G|DXG|K2| Rooted Nook Touch
For my money WAF says "Older models supporting WAF naming convention" and MESQUITE says "Newer models supporting MESQUITE naming convention".

The average user won't care that they are the "same" if one doesn't work on the other.

I am taking this from an application end-user viewpoint obviously.
We are already lumbered with a pile of older apps that "Don't Work" for the sake of a simple naming convention alteration...

resisting urge to Amazon bash...

Last edited by twobob; 04-09-2013 at 05:44 PM.
twobob is offline   Reply With Quote