Thread: US Judge rules against 2nd-hand digital music sales
View Single Post
Old 04-03-2013, 08:48 AM   #20
usuallee
Media Junkie
usuallee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.usuallee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.usuallee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.usuallee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.usuallee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.usuallee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.usuallee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.usuallee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.usuallee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.usuallee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.usuallee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
usuallee's Avatar
 
Posts: 278
Karma: 2039392
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Device: Kobo Libra H20, Kindle PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApK View Post
Correct. There's some discussion of the definition in this doc:
http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/...7&context=dltr
Thanks for posting that. I can see that "phonorecord" was the legal term applied to records, cassettes, etc, as a catch-all for any copyrighted recorded material, and now they are talking about digital phonorecords.

Even though thanks to you I now have a basic understanding of the term from a legal perspective, it still makes me chuckle to hear mp3 files referred to in that manner
usuallee is offline   Reply With Quote