Thread: US Judge rules against 2nd-hand digital music sales
View Single Post
Old 04-02-2013, 04:02 PM   #19
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,389
Karma: 68329346
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jozawun View Post
The word "phonorecords" comes from the Act, not the Judge.
Correct. There's some discussion of the definition in this doc:
http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/...7&context=dltr
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote