|
Wow - lots to read since yesterday!
Right, firts, the results of my long test of sleeping my "old model" Touch. 22 hours sleeping with the beams interrupted: drop from 43% to 42% battery, according to the display. I am therefore willing to say that there is no sign of any behaviour exhibited by the later Touches and Glo(e)s in my model.
I find thiis intersting given the opinions of David and Shai-Hulud that there is little if any difference between the firmware and hardware in the older and later Touches - and, by inference, the Glo except for the obvious lights.
I thought has occurred - dose the same battery-drain occur if the IR sensors are interrupted when the affected Glo/Touches are powered off, or is it only the sleep process that so afflicts them?
|