View Single Post
Old 09-04-2008, 02:35 PM   #96
Shaggy
Wizard
Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Shaggy's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilotbob View Post
Right, but they only need to store the index data once the page/site has been indexed. There is no need for them to keep the whole page in their cache... which the do if you have ever view google cached pages.
I understand that, but Taylor's argument is that there should be no caching of his copyrighted material (or profitting from it via advertisements) at all. He's saying he wants zero caching, not just changing how long a cache is kept for. To me, it sounds like he's saying "no caching of copyrighted content, ever" which I was pointing out means "no search engines".

Also, as acidzebra pointed out, not retaining any cache means that you completely lose the excerpt/context and search results just become a list of URLs with no way of knowing any more details without going to every link.

Yes, as you pointed out, there are already ways to get google to not retain a cache as well as to not index your site at all. Taylor doesn't seem to be happy with those solutions though.

Last edited by Shaggy; 09-04-2008 at 02:38 PM.
Shaggy is offline   Reply With Quote