View Single Post
Old 03-27-2013, 10:25 AM   #152
BearMountainBooks
Maria Schneider
BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
BearMountainBooks's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,746
Karma: 26439330
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Austin, Texas
Device: 3g Kindle Keyboard
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
This is not true.

It is true for trademarks. If a company doesn't protect its trademarks, it can lose the exclusive right to the trademark.

But it does not apply to copyright.

I'm not willing to risk it. My understanding is that it can affect my ability to protect copyright if I make a statement about "it's okay to do this" if it directly goes against the licensing agreement and the copyright. I see no good reason to grant exceptions.
BearMountainBooks is offline   Reply With Quote