Isn't it odd, if the authors and publishers are the ones requiring DRM, that they allow
the sellers to dictate the DRM scam to be applied? If it's "all right you can have DRM
but it will have to be our proprietary DRM" or you can't sell your books here, why do
the sellers take on that added expense/effort? Wouldn't it be in the authors and
publishers interest to adopt a DRM that would be common to all?
Luck;
Ken
|