View Single Post
Old 03-15-2013, 12:28 PM   #73
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,560
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rizla View Post
Yes, it's a given that they are already paying their permanent employees a pension. It's their short-term contract staff that they are not currently paying a pension.

I did wonder about the agency / employer differentiation. Does this mean Amazon in theory will be able to avoid contributing the 3% when the reform act kicks in?
The "employer contribution" will be paid by the agency. It's they who are the employer, not Amazon.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote