|
I don't think cost should be a factor in our decision to read a book. Neither paid nor free guarantees quality. True, there are exceptions, but most public libraries carry copies of the latest books. The reasons I find fault with the idea of using our library as one of the categories is as I have already stated, (1) free is a poor reason to choose a book, and (2) the library is a great resource (see our current month's selection as an example) but a poor choice for a category. I would have the same objections to naming the Kindle Store or Barnes and Nobel as a category.
I'm also opposed to the idea having paid books as a category, although in truth I think the two categories that reject the free books (Users Choice and Normally Priced) were tongue-in-cheek protests over the win of the MR Library. Quality should be the overriding factor that determines which book we should read, not price.
|