View Single Post
Old 03-13-2013, 04:30 PM   #564
CallOfCth'reader
Cultist
CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
CallOfCth'reader's Avatar
 
Posts: 196
Karma: 8624438
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Device: Sony PRS 505, Kobo Mini, Kobo Glo, Kobo Forma, Kindle DX
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
Doing nothing maybe? Why do you need an alternative.

Is it also OK to block site that publish things that are not allowed to be published in UK? According to your reasoning that seems to be the case and blocking should have been used when sites outside UK published the unallowed images of some royalty.
A couple of things:
- no court had been asked to rule that the photo's of the royals were illegal to print.
- the Pirate Bay was blocked because of an action brought by an organisation that represented copyright holders, it was not blocked because someone in authority had a random musing to block it.

An ISP either has to voluntarily choose to block a website (for whatever reason), or it has to be 'asked' by a judge after a court ruling.
CallOfCth'reader is offline   Reply With Quote