View Single Post
Old 03-09-2013, 12:08 PM   #35
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pulpmeister View Post
I find Chaucer hard sledding, but comprehensible, although a lot of his vocabulary, and many idioms, are extinct. A glossary is helpful, and simple modernising of spelling makes a huge difference. Shakespeare is much better heard and seen than read--the plays were meant to be performed
One major difference between Chaucer and Shakespeare is of course that Chaucer is Middle English, whereas Shakespeare is Modern English. Middle English is a distinct language, with different grammar to Modern English. Also, Chaucer, like all educated men of his time, was trilingual in English, French, and Latin, and even his English works (he wrote in all three languages) are full of French and Latin words.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote