View Single Post
Old 03-09-2013, 09:39 AM   #494
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
That's the copyright to the performance. As I said in my previous message, the work (which is what you referred to in your earlier message) is owned by whoever wrote it. The terms can be confusing. But it really doesn't matter - it's still copyright infringement either way.
Really? Because youtube videos of people singing songs that are under copyright were removed by record companies. If the companies only have the copyright to performances, then they shouldn't have the right to get the videos removed.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote