View Single Post
Old 03-09-2013, 09:12 AM   #492
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
As has been explained to you on several occasions already, this process is only used in cases where the site lies outside the jurisdiction of the court. It's pointless to speculate on hypothetical ways in which the law might be changed in the future. As things stand, this is the law.
Nobody pointed to a law which specifies that this process is only used in cases where the site lies outside the jurisdiction of the court. This is the current practice, not the current law.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Nonsense. If a book is sold by a publisher, or a record is sold by a record company, they don't "own" it. Copyright is still retained by the author.
If you look at the links murraypaul gave in post #483, under copyright owners you have the companies, not people.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote