Quote:
Originally Posted by DNSB
Thanks for your input in improving the usefulness of that test file. I've added several fractions to your changes as suggested by PeterT and re-uploaded it in a reply to GeoffR. I never bothered with the <i>, <em> and <strong> tags but it's likely that some people will find them useful. Any other changes you feel would make the file more useful to more people, feel free to do so.
|
No problem. I was wondering about including all the special glyphs (fractions, ligatures etc) in the main text line, so that they get displayed in the different font-styles (bold, italics). This would trap the cases where a glyph is present in e.g., normal style but not bold/italic.
I was also thinking about having a whole sample paragraph (of several lines) in normal, to give an idea of the general reading experience with that font.