View Single Post
Old 02-21-2013, 01:48 AM   #4
twobits
Addict
twobits ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobits ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobits ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobits ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobits ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobits ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobits ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobits ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobits ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobits ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobits ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 223
Karma: 1057019
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by twobits View Post
I think the run time library one should get updated to match the normal 2.7.3 one.
ok, I think it may be the same library one for both installation with the difference in length being due to paths used when it was built... I built a bad zipfile on purpose and the both throw the error from the same line number anyway... cant really be 100% sure though.... however it does seem odd that the same file can work with cygwin pythons 2.7.3 zipfile.pyo and not the one shipped with the windows pylib.zip


and I think I found the issue, the script does some things differently when invoked as a plug in that had it passing a bad path into zipfile.py , so user error then, never mind! Sorry.

Last edited by twobits; 02-21-2013 at 02:04 AM.
twobits is offline   Reply With Quote