[latepaul]

The link in your sig leads to a page with a forwarding link which is broken (missing a .com).

Also there are about as many grammatical errors in your short review as in the story you're reviewing (missing apostrophe, sentence fragments, beginning a sentence with a conjunction).

As someone said the updates are for future readers and one of the functions of a review is for someone to decide whether they want to read the book or not. The publisher probably commented on your review not so much to get you to re-read as to let your readers know that the version they get will likely not have the same problems.