View Single Post
Old 02-14-2013, 03:23 AM   #142
TGS
Country Member
TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
TGS's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,058
Karma: 7676767
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Denmark
Device: Liseuse: Irex DR800. PRS 505 in the house, and the missus has an iPad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laridae View Post
But that's just the thing about Conscience, you see - if it doesn't bother you then it's not an issue. It's not a matter of Proof.

Again, by invoking "Conscience" you are implying that the question of whether this is an ethical issue is already settled in favour of the affirmative - which is just the point at issue. As far as I can understand what you are saying you seem to be simply asserting two things: 1, browsing without buying is an ethical issue, and 2, browsing without buying has a negative ethical value. But you have not told me in virtue of what you think that 1 is true - other than that you think or feel it's true, and therefore 2 simply doesn't arise.
TGS is offline   Reply With Quote