View Single Post
Old 02-05-2013, 03:23 PM   #65
Jozawun
Fanatic
Jozawun ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jozawun ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jozawun ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jozawun ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jozawun ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jozawun ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jozawun ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jozawun ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jozawun ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jozawun ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jozawun ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Jozawun's Avatar
 
Posts: 519
Karma: 2693434
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Australia
Device: Cybook Gen 3, Pocketbook 902, Sony 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuantumIguana View Post
Is there any precedent for applying this to an autobiography? If you could apply the law in that way, then you should be able to apply it to any non-fiction book. After all, people are buying the book for the content, so if you can sue because the content is false, you could sue for any non-fiction book that had false contents - and there would be a lot of them.
Not an autobiography, but Irving and Howard Hughes is one where a purchaser (the publisher) sued.
Other non-fiction books are in the same position as autobiographies, as they ought to be. Inducing people to buy them by making fraudulent claims about their contents would be actionable.
Jozawun is offline   Reply With Quote