View Single Post
Old 08-26-2008, 10:40 AM   #92
nekokami
fruminous edugeek
nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
nekokami's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,745
Karma: 551260
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northeast US
Device: iPad, eBw 1150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Jordan View Post
One thing consumers could really use is information on those "breakeven points" for products... it would help make smart decisions (especially on products like "disposables," which often have no breakeven point). If we ever get serious about tracking environmental costs and impacts on products, and including those costs into pricing, breakeven data will be important.
Well, the whole idea of "breakeven" is to compare two items, and in this context, we're usually comparing durable goods to disposables. But to compare durable goods to other durable goods, we'd need a raw "energy to manufacture" value (and possibly "kilos of pollutants" as well). "Energy to manufacture" probably does get factored into the cost to the consumer, but "kilos of pollutants" often does not, resulting in one generation building up the environmental equivalent of debt that the next will need to deal with.
nekokami is offline   Reply With Quote