View Single Post
Old 01-29-2013, 09:00 PM   #49
Dan23
Connoisseur
Dan23 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dan23 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dan23 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dan23 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dan23 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dan23 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dan23 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dan23 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dan23 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dan23 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dan23 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 73
Karma: 600000
Join Date: Sep 2007
Device: Scribe, Paperwhite 6.8"
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
Perhaps companies should only offer subsidised phones with a lengthy contract with substantial penalty clauses for early termination. Simple contract law can cover this situation perfectly well, without tying phones to a single network when there are no technical limitations.
This is currently what the companies do in the US. Carriers charge an early termination fee ($350 for sprint) that decreases as you get closer to contract expiration.
Dan23 is offline   Reply With Quote