View Single Post
Old 08-22-2008, 10:22 AM   #8
Shaggy
Wizard
Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Shaggy's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daithi View Post
Does this mean that the lady who posted a 30 second video of her baby dancing to Prince could sue Prince for issuing the takedown notice?
That's exactly what it means. If someone issues a take down notice in "bad faith", IE they know that they don't have a valid claim but try to use the DMCA to take the content down anyway, you can bring a counter claim against them.

It (theoretically) is there to prevent the DMCA from being used by large corporations to intimidate/scare people into taking down content that the corporation doesn't like, but don't necessarily have a valid copyright claim over.
Shaggy is offline   Reply With Quote