View Single Post
Old 08-22-2008, 09:03 AM   #5
acidzebra
Liseuse Lover
acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
acidzebra's Avatar
 
Posts: 869
Karma: 1035404
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Netherlands
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Jordan View Post
Not until someone tells me how it's fair for me to use it.

[...]

I don't see this as anything more than another loophole woven into the fabric of copyright law.
Steve, the case in point was a 29-second video of a toddler dancing to Prince's "Let's Go Crazy" uploaded by a mother to YouTube. I don't see how that is not fair use, which by the way, seems pretty well defined in the US - although you are right that this is not a global arrangement, but then again, neither is copyright.

What is happening now is that content owners (again, as distinct from content creators in most cases) go after people with automated & rubber-stamped takedown notices under the DMCA. See also "why my printer received a DMCA takedown notice". I hope that cases like this will put an end to that practice.

Last edited by acidzebra; 08-22-2008 at 09:07 AM.
acidzebra is offline   Reply With Quote