View Single Post
Old 01-21-2013, 08:54 PM   #82
ereadingdotcom
CEO, Ereading.com
ereadingdotcom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ereadingdotcom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ereadingdotcom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ereadingdotcom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ereadingdotcom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ereadingdotcom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ereadingdotcom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ereadingdotcom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ereadingdotcom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ereadingdotcom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ereadingdotcom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 46
Karma: 1002524
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Device: iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by derangedhermit View Post
Of course. But whoever - author, publisher, retailer, marketer - pays for the required editor(s) is taking a fixed cost that who pays for is irrelevant to how the market moves.
Hmmm, can't say that I necessarily agree with that.

First, editorial work is not at all a "fixed cost". It depends on the author, the editor assigned to them, the size of the publisher involved, how many editors and associate editors are involved in a project, etc.

All of those factors (and a whole lot more) greatly affect how the publisher does business, which in turn affects pricing through every level of the pipeline. And that, in turn, most assuredly influences how the market moves as a whole, especially when it is multiplied hundreds of times by the number of titles published domestically each month alone.
ereadingdotcom is offline   Reply With Quote