View Single Post
Old 08-21-2008, 12:48 PM   #54
acidzebra
Liseuse Lover
acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
acidzebra's Avatar
 
Posts: 869
Karma: 1035404
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Netherlands
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilotbob View Post
I'm sorry... how do you figure that? RAR compresses a file so there is less to transfer and store, whether you are using bit torrent or not. Although I do prefer Zip because I own Winzip (yes I paid for it). BOb
I have already explained to him that I am saving 1.26 Gb of bandwidth for every complete copy transferred by using compression. Right now I've doled out 15 complete copies - that is a non-trivial amount of bandwidth. Not to mention that the type of person who doesn't mind a 7.5 Gb archive sitting on his disk propably has some space to spare. I use RAR as it has a slightly better compression ratio than zip - if you are looking for a free, winzip-like program that handles most archive formats I highly recommend Tugzip - http://www.tugzip.com

Last edited by acidzebra; 08-21-2008 at 12:50 PM.
acidzebra is offline   Reply With Quote