View Single Post
Old 01-06-2013, 09:29 AM   #17
twobob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°){ʇlnɐɟ ƃǝs}Týr
twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
twobob's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,586
Karma: 6299993
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: uti gratia usura (Yao ying da ying; Mo ying da yieng)
Device: PW-WIFI|K5-3G+WIFI| K4|K3-3G|DXG|K2| Rooted Nook Touch
did you amend the symlink to point to /mnt/us/usr after you placed the new files on FAT.

mntroot rw
cd /
ln -fs /mnt/us/usr mntususr
mntroot ro


Quote:
-f, --force
remove existing destination files
so that should be fine as a oneshot deal.

It is worth pointing out that you can grab a not "totally weird" one from debian.

however mine is setup in this way to allow for maximum flexibility with minimal rootfs impact. sorry for the extra effort.

You can also use SED to replace the value in the BINARY. let me go find that command..
*goes and finds SED command* ah yeah this kind of thing

Last edited by twobob; 01-06-2013 at 09:36 AM. Reason: linky for SED example
twobob is offline   Reply With Quote