View Single Post
Old 12-31-2012, 09:31 PM   #14
Prestidigitweeze
Fledgling Demagogue
Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Prestidigitweeze's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,384
Karma: 31132263
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: White Plains
Device: Clara HD; Oasis 2; Aura HD; iPad Air; PRS-350; Galaxy S7.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveEisenberg View Post
Every occurrence? Where did you get that?
Why, from quotes like this:

Quote:
This is a book that centers around [insert plot involving political intrigue]. Few novels I read strike me as particularly political. This one did.
The problem is that you're judging a literary work based on the fact that it is political rather than on how well it functions as a novel. Judging a novel based on whether or not you approve of its politics is juvenile. George Orwell was a socialist and wrote like one, yet credible conservative critics of his time would never have stooped to condemning his writing based on their disagreement with his beliefs. It's always about the writing and never about the politics.

Last edited by Prestidigitweeze; 01-01-2013 at 03:04 AM. Reason: Added the word *on*.
Prestidigitweeze is offline   Reply With Quote