View Single Post
Old 12-19-2012, 01:16 PM   #12
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sil_liS View Post
The 12 month period seems interesting, but I'm not sure if it can be properly implemented. For example, if a book has the set price of $15, a retailer can sell it for 11 months at this price and then have a higher discount and sell it for 1 month at $7.50. But if the loss per book encountered in the discount month exceeds the profit from the previous 11 months, then the retailer is in breach of contract.
Yes, that is basically the point.
It allows retailers to either have a constant discount, or to run weekly/monthly/yearly promotions. Or just to have random discount days.
But they have to balance the books overall.
I see it as benefiting retailers who have better control over, and knowledge of, their operations, vs those who are poorly managed.
In other words, good for Amazon
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote