MobileRead Forums - View Single Post

madeira · 12-19-2012, 06:05 AM

Thanks for the prompt reply. I agree with you that networked filesystems are not the best solution when you seek performance.
I already use a dropbox based solution that is ok unless the need to replicate the same library on some machines. Not efficient.
What I reported is not that should be implemented a solution to manage remote calibre DB with user access control but that in my opinion some details of the processing related to the GUI use maybe could be optimized. I mean, If a panel is hidden, why access data that never will be shown. If I right click on a item to get a context menu, why about 0,5 Mb should be read.
Today I don't have the right skills to help in the development but in testing I have my words to say. Ciao.

12-19-2012, 06:05 AM	#5
madeira Junior Member Posts: 4 Karma: 10 Join Date: Jul 2010 Device: BeBook Mini	Thanks for the prompt reply. I agree with you that networked filesystems are not the best solution when you seek performance. I already use a dropbox based solution that is ok unless the need to replicate the same library on some machines. Not efficient. What I reported is not that should be implemented a solution to manage remote calibre DB with user access control but that in my opinion some details of the processing related to the GUI use maybe could be optimized. I mean, If a panel is hidden, why access data that never will be shown. If I right click on a item to get a context menu, why about 0,5 Mb should be read. Today I don't have the right skills to help in the development but in testing I have my words to say. Ciao.