Quote:
Originally Posted by elcreative
Not at all, I read, "I do not presume to know whether this is basis for mistrial, but it's certainly wrong." from you which doesn't mention law merely whether it may be the basis for mistrial when the judge has already said that it wasn't the basis for mistrial followed by your comment that it was wrong... this seems to be you putting your opinion ahead of the trial judge... this makes my comment perfectly applicable...
|
Please read what I said. I said that I do not know whether it is the basis for mistrial (which means I do not presume to know the law), but that misleading the jury with false information (i.e., telling them that prior art does not apply because it does not run on the same hardware) is wrong. You might think that misleading the jury is fair game, and good for you, but it's not my opinion. The fact that, in my opinion, is wrong does not mean that it is against the law, or any basis for mistrial.