Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres
The judge cited chapter and verse of the guidelines; Basically she said it was Samsung's job to vet the potential jurors and that the same way they found out after the fact was the way they should have found out *before* the trial.
Appeals courts do not generally overturn civil court cases because the plaintif's counsel did not do their job diligently. Certainly not in a duel of deep pockets vs deep pockets.
Time for both sides to call a truce so they can both declare victory.  |
But vetting the jurors is still based on their answers. Should Samsung have assumed that the juror didn't tell the truth about having been involved in a lawsuit?