Quote:
Originally Posted by afv011
Exactly. He strikes me as a very arrogant person, presuming to know the law better than lawyers/judges, and assuming the role of leader in deliberations, misleading the jury into thinking that prior art didn't apply because "it does not run on the same hardware". I do not presume to know whether this is basis for mistrial, but it's certainly wrong.
|
Certain element of pot and kettle here unless you can confirm you are a senior counsel or appellate court judge...
If the judge has decided it doesn't need a new case then I'll take the judge's view until or unless reversed by a higher court...