View Single Post
Old 12-18-2012, 03:35 AM   #26
rogue_librarian
Guru
rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rogue_librarian's Avatar
 
Posts: 973
Karma: 4269175
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Device: Pocketbook Basic 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
If a word has an umlaut, you can always replace the umlaut with a following "e". For example, as I understand it, if a word is normally spelt with an "ö", you can always write "oe" in place of the "ö". That's right, isn't it?
As a rule, no

Quote:
Does it not work the other way around, too? ie, are you saying that you CAN'T replace an "oe" with a "ö"?
It depends. Old-fashioned spellings sometimes use it, e.g. the Austrian National Bank refers to itself as "Oesterreichische (not: Österreichische) Nationalbank", and you wouldn't change that. It's rare, though.

Last edited by rogue_librarian; 12-18-2012 at 03:42 AM.
rogue_librarian is offline   Reply With Quote