|
I'm am just curious as to in what circumstance the circular replace all would give you problems. if you have already fixed some instances of whatever, then there's no harm in letting fly with a circular replace-all, as it should not find anything that needs fixing before your current position ?
maybe the issue will get revisited one day IF you make a strong case for it - who knows.
I've never had an issue; once I understood that it worked circularly I just accepted that fact and I cannot think of a case where I would "need" it to be non-circular
|