Quote:
Originally Posted by RickyMaveety
OK ..... this is point one. The border agents are conducting searches. Border searches do not, and have never, required evidence of wrongdoing. This is an important point that this article's author chooses to ignore ... but let's move on.
|
And this is exactly what we are all talking about, border searches, just like other searches should require evidence of wrongdoing.
So if a law is wrong do we bring attention to the fact that it is wrong, or do we just shrug our shoulders and say "well that is the law, so deal with it?" We are all simply bringing attention to the fact that we believe in this case that the law is wrong.
I congratulate any Senator who has the courage to stand up and say, "this is wrong!" Though unfortunately Senator Feingold is an attorney by trade, and so most likely the law will be written in an incomprehensible way, and thus require years of legal battles to sort out what it is actually saying, but why not throw away additional American GDP to the court systems instead of any actual production?