View Single Post
Old 08-13-2008, 04:22 AM   #152
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milarepa View Post
This is entirely about civil liberties. Do you honestly believe it is correct for the government to suspend civil liberties just because somebody has broken the law?
In every country there is a balance between the rights of the individual, and the collective safety and "rights" of the population as a whole. To use a very jaded example, the right to free speech does not extend to being allowed to shout "Fire!" in a crowded theatre. Similarly, the "right" to freedom does not prevent the freedom of people who break the law from being curtailed.

In a democracy, the government represents the collective will of the people. If the majority of the population feels that the government is not representing their will, that government will, generally speaking, be voted out of office.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote