View Single Post
Old 08-11-2008, 05:13 PM   #430
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,092
Karma: 315558332
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
I just looked it up. We're both wrong :-)

The the US, works published on or after 1923 that were still in copyright in 1998 had their term of protection extended from 75 years to 95 years, but not to life of author + 95 years.

Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward View Post
I'm not a lawyer, and has not read the specific Bono amendment law, but I believe it extended to life + 95 for existing works (in 1998) and left the new works thereafter at life + 70.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote