View Single Post
Old 08-11-2008, 09:01 AM   #381
acidzebra
Liseuse Lover
acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
acidzebra's Avatar
 
Posts: 869
Karma: 1035404
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Netherlands
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Jordan View Post
Do you believe that creative people have no right to make money from their work? Do you believe that you, as a consumer, have no responsibility to compensate an artist, not even a dime, for a work you obtain? Do you, as a consumer, believe that you and you alone should have the final say on what someone else deserves to make from their work?
Speaking of semantics, I would appreciate it if you did not take my words out of context (I was addressing someone who was trying to apply the unique-physical-copy-of-something structure to the digital age and I was arguing we should look at usage count), okay? Thanks.

As for what I believe, I do believe the author should be compensated. Not the entire information control structure that has grown fat around them, which brings us right back to square one - the system is broken.

Also, consumers ultimately decide what people make from their work - we call this free market, supply and demand, and so forth.

Last edited by acidzebra; 08-11-2008 at 09:04 AM.
acidzebra is offline   Reply With Quote