View Single Post
Old 08-11-2008, 04:24 AM   #360
acidzebra
Liseuse Lover
acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.acidzebra ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
acidzebra's Avatar
 
Posts: 869
Karma: 1035404
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Netherlands
Device: PRS-505
Okay, great (and IMHO reasonable) but do you think the content owners would agree with that? Because I'm pretty sure they would scream bloody murder. Note that the content owners are not necessarily the content creators.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
I'd have no issues with that, because the author has been compensated for the book you've read, and nobody else can read that copy at the same time that you are.
Why is the uniqueness or exclusive of the copy important? The entire point of the digital age is that scarcity as found in physical objects doesn't exist any longer.

What I am getting at, if we could find a way to notify the library of the books we're "virtually loaning", and they pay out the authors based on usage, and all this is covered by my library card and the taxes which pay for the library, who stands to lose?

It is not us or our morals that are broken, it is the content management and delivery system.

Last edited by acidzebra; 08-11-2008 at 04:30 AM.
acidzebra is offline   Reply With Quote