Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant
I don't think one needs to take a balanced view of all situations.
|
I don't think you need to treat every lunatic as though they have a Nobel prize. However, when it's a matter of contract law, you need to:
a) strive for a balanced, neutral and factual view
b) figure out who actually signed what
c) require both parties to abide by their agreements and contract law
I'd also say it is slightly ridiculous to treat a filing -- by either the plaintiffs or defense -- as though it is gospel truth.
More to the point, contract disputes aren't about your emotional reactions about "what is fair." It's about
what is in the contracts. And you're not going to get a *cough* balanced view about the validity of a particular legal argument from a cheerleader for the plaintiffs.