View Single Post
Old 08-10-2008, 11:25 AM   #18
Danny Fekete
Electronic Education Buff
Danny Fekete knows the complete value of PI to the endDanny Fekete knows the complete value of PI to the endDanny Fekete knows the complete value of PI to the endDanny Fekete knows the complete value of PI to the endDanny Fekete knows the complete value of PI to the endDanny Fekete knows the complete value of PI to the endDanny Fekete knows the complete value of PI to the endDanny Fekete knows the complete value of PI to the endDanny Fekete knows the complete value of PI to the endDanny Fekete knows the complete value of PI to the endDanny Fekete knows the complete value of PI to the end
 
Danny Fekete's Avatar
 
Posts: 84
Karma: 31076
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Device: Bookeen Cybook Gen3, iRex DR1000s, Sony Reader PRS 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Electronic distribution would knock a few $ or perhaps 10s of $ off prices. You're never going to get $5 organic chemistry textbooks.
Perhaps not yet, but through Connexions, you can get a $20 textbook, hardcover. I haven't evaluated their printing facilities in comparison with larger commercial operations so I can't speak to the difference in quality, but my impression from Baraniuk's talk is that the price is obviated by the print-on-demand architecture combined with a complete (and voluntary, and legal) disregard for contributor monetary remuneration.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
[. . .] it's a combination of very low sales (compared with fiction) and very high production costs which make them expensive. In the example you mention above, the "specialised equipment" to produce a technical illustration would still have been required whether that picture ends up on paper or in an electronic document.
I offer a trade in theoretical costs, Harry: we've been ignoring the cost of commissioning artwork, which I don't think is yet taken into account by Connexions (and would require the same prestige imperatives of academe or the same altruism of progressive pedagogy; this is something that the Creative Commons movement may solve, but I don't think we're there yet). I will admit this cost, but I think it fair that you should admit, where digital transmission (even legal, golly-whiz) is involved, the fancier things we can do with print technology, such as transparent overlays and super high-resolution, can be achieved with current image and video embedding technology, and can be produced for a nominal fee if not gratis by the author of these materials with equipment and software owned/licensed by his or her institution. What say you?

(Also, in honest curiosity and full cordiality, I was wondering what your field of study is, Harry. I didn't realise this was an area touching you personally, and if I've hurt your feelings with my approach in this conversation, please accept my sincere apologies.)

Last edited by Danny Fekete; 08-10-2008 at 11:27 AM.
Danny Fekete is offline   Reply With Quote