View Single Post
Old 11-20-2012, 03:53 AM   #9
chaley
Grand Sorcerer
chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 12,499
Karma: 8065348
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Notts, England
Device: Kobo Libra 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by weedy View Post
I would just like to point out we DON'T have to do it this way. Yes using full file system enumeration is the way almost all applications use MTP, but that is not how windows explorer does it. And as of the past few months we have been cluing into this. First with a proof of concept from google https://github.com/hanwen/go-mtpfs/, and then a nice fork of gfvs from Phillip https://github.com/philipl/gvfs. And that is just what I found in 5 minutes.
I don't know if this will change how MTP is implemented, but on-demand file enumeration is not hard. I'm just tired of seeing the same excuse/statement.
You are welcome to do the work and submit the patch. As it "is not hard" it shouldn't take you too long, and you will make some people happy.

PS: I am one of the developers who might choose to do this work. However, I have zero need for or interest in it, so am not willing to spend the time to do the implementation and maintenance.

Last edited by chaley; 11-20-2012 at 04:35 AM.
chaley is offline   Reply With Quote