View Single Post
Old 11-17-2012, 07:05 PM   #584
holymadness
Guru
holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
holymadness's Avatar
 
Posts: 722
Karma: 2084955
Join Date: Dec 2010
Device: iPhone
Quote:
Originally Posted by afv011 View Post
Ah, once more, avoiding the question. All rests on proving that apple lost sales to Samsung due to this "blatant copying" you are referring to. Yet, we have seen no evidence whatsoever of such claims.

All you do is copy/paste pages from a document with no arguments from you; as bilbo says, you seem to have run out of steam. The truth is that apple lost no sales at all to Samsung, people chose Samsung not because "it blatanly copied the iphone", but simply because they liked what was on offer better than what apple had on offer. Apple has rested on their laurels and iOS hasn't really changed since 2007; it's dated, and it shows.
So you no longer deny that Samsung copied Apple. Now the criteria is whether the copying led to lost sales. Is that right?

Just verifying.
holymadness is offline