Quote:
Originally Posted by jjallenupthehill
In short, that's debatable, no it doesn't, and no it most certainly isn't  |
To me, it's a rip-off. It "most certainly isn't" what? Don't know what you are referring to in the last part of that sentence.
Quote:
|
I could elaborate and prove this, and it is probably also useful in relation to the debate about phone design copying, but you know you're proposing to argue a technical point about copyright of architectural design with an architect - right?
|
Shoot. Prove it.
Quote:
|
And neither building is most definitely an 'architectural masterpiece'!
|
I disagree (in regards to Polshek and Pei).
Quote:
I'm going to take that in the spirit of a jovial dig in the ribs. You don't really want to have that discussion do you? 
|
Why not? Go ahead. You do know there are bad architects, don't you? Or perhaps "Sh..." mentality is clouding objectivity?
--Pat