View Single Post
Old 08-06-2008, 09:31 PM   #122
cstross
Cynic
cstross will become famous soon enoughcstross will become famous soon enoughcstross will become famous soon enoughcstross will become famous soon enoughcstross will become famous soon enoughcstross will become famous soon enough
 
Posts: 86
Karma: 514
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Device: Lots, started with a Psion 3 circa 1998
Quote:
Originally Posted by nekokami View Post
Yes, out of print books are a separate matter entirely. I'm of the opinion that if a book falls out of print for some specified period of time (e.g. 5 years, though I'd actually prefer a shorter period) it should automatically first revert rights completely to the author (if living), then go into the public domain if it still remains out of print.
That's very problematic.

If your proposal was adopted in law, unscrupulous publishers would have an active incentive to time-bomb their reversion clause boilerplate. Because? If a book goes into the public domain, the publisher can then roll the presses without paying the author a penny. And they're the folks who are in the best position to profit from a book's initial sales and then keep it out of print for five years. (Then re-issue it and make roughly double their initial profit, at the expense of the author.)
cstross is offline   Reply With Quote