My two cents for this discussion...
First we were talking about a music library what is able to collect classical music with the special metadata for this kind of content. Then we are talking about comparison of very old versions of MM.
Now we are talking about ripping and high quality in combination with mp3. Talking about high quality and mp3 at the same time and to the end bring in a sound polishing - this in combination with classical music? Hello, do you feel what is going wrong?
Hm sorry, for me this looks like something of a discussion without understanding principals in hi-fi, digital music and audio equipment (hopefully not in combination of a $5 loud speaker or head speaker...).
I am using MM for my library and about 1/3 of my library (1000+ own CD's and LP's) is classical and all of these are digitalized as lossless flac files. I can't see for the moment any of AnnyWalkers concerns what is a show stopper criteria of using MM as a universal audio library. As others already wrote, MM is very flexible to handle audio content in the way a user need it. But you have to learn the handling in the same way as with Calibre. Both programs have a huge functional capacity for those who like to work with it.
If it is not the right one, you maybe find something what match better to your needs.
Sorry for the poor English but I think, you know what I like to say.
|