Quote:
Originally Posted by afv011
Here's the AD they ran on the papers. Dry as the desert, but at least it's "court-approved".
|
The only thing that might still be questioned is that the court order was that
Apple had to acknowledge the ruling; it had to 'come from the horse's mouth'.
Since there is no logo attached, there is nothing in this advert that tells the reader that the message is from Apple. They've complied with the letter of the ruling again, but still haven't quite complied with the spirit of it.
However, they've garnered so much negative publicity about this across the press, that it's probably now done the job that the court wanted, and got the message out that the Tab doesn't infringe.
Graham