Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwidude
@DiapDealer - sigh... after all the months of beta testing you just *had* to wait until the day after we release to figure this out, didn't you...
I didn't even know you could do that with the Sigil (Qt) environment. And yes I can replicate it. It seems to change the order that Qt disposes of its objects and I can see where it is failing in the code. Obviously it is too late for 0.6.0 now to be fixed, but we'll try to fix it for 0.6.1 (which won't be any time soon based on how drained the devs are at this point).
|
I know, I know. Terrible timing, right?. But I truly
just now nailed down the steps and wanted to make sure it was documented and "out there". Now mark it down and forget it about for a good long while. v0.6.0 is an amazing piece of collaborative work, and I—in no way—intended to "harsh your mellow" on its release day.

It (the bug) won't slow me down in the least and it doesn't sound like many people use the functionality that exposes it anyway.