Quote:
Originally Posted by pshrynk
I would tell you the citation of the rule I am invoking, but that would directly violate said rule, being one of those rules. Therefore, I am moving on to the natural dialectic of the unstated rule and announce: Cambridge.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LazyScot
These pandaborg are dangerously good.
Worringly brilliant...
Hmmm...
No only does this rule out cross-limits, it makes interchange at Châtelet Les Halles unstable (which, to be fair, it usually is), and Oxford Street becomes recursive. And it means I have to pass.
Drat.
|
well now that pshrynk has invoked one of
those rules and lazyscot has been obliged to pass, it opens up the First Great Perpendicular and i can triumphantly play East Ham, shielded from any rolls of the shiny dice by the New Old Interchange Convention which effectively provides me with full diplomatic immunity under the third revision issued retroactively in 4507CE. i believe the only logical counter (Neasden) having been ruled out implicitly by the unnameable sub-section of pshrynk's unmentionable rule, we are now in a situaion of ordinary paradoxality, which means it's the end of the inning. who's up ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor514ce
Word to the wise: do not perform a image search on the phrase "ball cage".
|
sound advice.