View Single Post
Old 10-08-2012, 10:59 PM   #26
derangedhermit
Addict
derangedhermit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.derangedhermit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.derangedhermit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.derangedhermit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.derangedhermit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.derangedhermit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.derangedhermit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.derangedhermit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.derangedhermit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.derangedhermit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.derangedhermit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 239
Karma: 1280000
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Device: None
The total end price, including tax, affects buyer choices. Amazon can charge 5%-10% higher prices where the buyer isn't going to pay sales tax while keeping the same sales volume. That 5%-10% of sales drops straight to Amazon's bottom line, and is a huge number, a huge competitive advantage. If I were Amazon, I'd try very hard to keep that advantage too.

The OP puts the question by tying together legality and ethics. To me they are not synonymous. I find it helpful to treat the two separately.
derangedhermit is offline   Reply With Quote