Quote:
Originally Posted by knc1
@projectdb : That error line you posted indicates an error in resolving the 4-tuple name.
The second-from-left (vendor == pc) is never a valid consideration, that field is for the vendor's use only.
The only thing that should be tested is the 3-tuple (triplet) made from the 4-tuple less the vendor's field.
|
Hi again knc1, I'm not even sure what the implications are regarding what you just said about the tuples and testing. Does this mean that I need to smooth the 4-tuple into a 3-tuple, eliminating the vendor field? If so I'm absolutely clueless about how to do so.
I wrote a small article here regarding my limited attempts, spent more time writing on ASCIIpOrtal though:
http://wp.me/p2k10-21
Let me know if you guys have any ideas